
|
For immediate
release -- Friday, October 31, 1997.
|
|
Jon
Zuspann Banned from Auto Sales for 30 Years
Attorney General alleged
that Ft. Dodge auto dealer conspired to create false damage disclosure statement.
Zuspann and Kim Russell plead guilty to criminal charges.
Ft. Dodge auto dealer
Jon Zuspann has pled guilty to criminal charges filed as a result of an
investigation by the Attorney General's Office and the state Department
of Transportation. Zuspann was ordered not to hold a motor vehicle dealer's
license in Iowa or any other state for a probation period of two years
and thirty years after that.
"We alleged that
Zuspann conspired with Kim Russell, owner of Freedom Auto Sales in Ft.
Dodge, to obtain a false damage disclosure statement in order to conceal
the fact that an auto had suffered about $9,000 in damages," Attorney
General Tom Miller said.
Miller said Zuspann
pled guilty this week in Webster County District Court in Ft. Dodge to
an aggravated misdemeanor criminal charge of "soliciting a fraudulent
practice." On Monday, District Court Judge Kurt L. Wilke sentenced Zuspann
to up to two years in prison, but suspended the prison sentence as long
as Zuspann complies with terms of probation.
Zuspann was ordered
not to hold or apply for a motor vehicle dealer's license in Iowa or any
other state for a two-year probation period and for thirty years after
that. He was ordered not to attend any auto auctions, not to work for
any business selling, leasing or repairing motor vehicles, and not to
buy or sell any motor vehicles other than up to two per year for his personal
use. Wilke also ordered Zuspann to pay a $500 fine.
Kim Russell pled
guilty to a serious misdemeanor charge of soliciting a fraudulent practice.
She was ordered to give up the dealer's license for Freedom Auto Sales
and prohibited from holding an Iowa motor vehicle dealer's license for
ten years.
According to documents
filed in the case, the charges were based on allegations that Zuspann
and Russell attempted to obtain a false damage disclosure statement for
a 1995 Ford Probe. The car was involved in a collision that caused over
$9,000 in damage, according to two independent body shop estimates obtained
by its owner, Lisa Schaumburg of Ft. Dodge. Instead of repairing the car,
Schaumburg received an $8,000 insurance settlement and sold the car for
$2300 to Zuspann and Russell.
Jon Zuspann, who
negotiated the $2300 purchase for Russell, refused to pay Schaumburg a
$3,000 asking price for the Probe, indicating that $3,000 was too much
to pay given the extent of damage to the vehicle.
After the sale, Schaumburg
completed the back of her title, indicating that the vehicle was sold
to Zuspann and that it had sustained damage of $8,000 while she was owner.
Within a couple of days, Zuspann contacted Schaumburg and demanded that
the damage disclosure be changed, according to court documents, but Schaumburg
refused. Schaumburg contacted the Webster County Treasurer's Office regarding
the situation and was referred to the Attorney General's Consumer Protection
Division. Miller's office then assisted Schaumburg and investigated Zuspann's
repeated efforts, in cooperation with Russell, to force Schaumburg to
falsify the statement so there would be no disclosure of prior damage.
"We very much appreciate
Lisa Schaumburg's honesty, even when Zuspann exerted strong pressure on
her to falsify the damage disclosure statement," Miller said. "We are
grateful for the cooperation she gave us in investigating this matter."
Miller said his office
also had taken action in 1995 against Zuspann and his dealership, Zuspann
Auto Brokers, for selling flood-damaged cars without disclosing the prior
damage to consumers. Zuspann paid $20,000 in settlement of the complaint,
and his dealership closed shortly thereafter.
"Failure to disclose
prior damage is a very serious violation," Miller said. "When a vehicle
has suffered substantial damage, of course its value drops substantially
and sometimes it may even have safety problems. These are things any buyer
is entitled to know, and that's why we treat it so seriously when someone
falsifies damage statements. We insist on accuracy and honesty when it
comes to disclosing prior damage."
|